Groovy Stuff: Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts

Monday, March 2, 2009

Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts

Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts

Most liberal Marin County Ca has repeatedly thumbed their nose at the US Constitution, then imposed their illegal actions onto a Nevada citizen. What's next?

I was pleased to see the recent US Supreme Court ruling about gun control. Along with others that are challenging previous court rulings and laws in light of the recent US Supreme Court ruling, one more challenge desperately needs to be immediately mounted. That is the blanket all-inclusive law that a person with any sort of restraining order against them is not allowed to have any sort of a gun. Based on my experience as a Deputy Sheriff, that is bad law and I have always believed that is unconstitutional. It is also even worse law when the restraining order is obtained by default and a contemptible law when obtained through breaking the court’s own rules to get the default in the first place. It is a gross denial of civil rights.

In one of my Among Us stories I’ve been following and reporting on, exactly that happened. When husband is caught in bigamy living a double life, wife changes locks to Reno family home. According to the Reno police report, that home is immediately violently broken into. Two well-secured doors were broken down. The second door was so well secured that the only way to get in was to break that door frame and surrounding sheet rock. This is exactly what happened according to the witnesses, Reno police report and photographs. It took 45 minutes to an hour to break through those two doors. The garage door was then blocked shut. The home is thoroughly ransacked, a knife is taken to their bed. According to the Truckee Meadows Community College police and Pat Slavin, there is then an attempted break-in of wife’s locker at Truckee Meadows Community College.

Average criminals breaking into a home take a minute to enter that home. If more than that, they immediately move on to the next home. To take the hour and hard work it did to break through those two door, thoroughly ransack the home and take a knife to the bed is evidence that wife is in danger. The attempted break-in at Truckee Meadows Community College is evidence that the wife remained in danger and the danger was escalating.

Wife has no history of violence. Husband does have flip-flop history. The evidence is there that the wife desperately needs a gun for protection.

Wife, who has lived in Reno since summer 1995, files for a divorce in Reno, Nevada. Husband does an end run and cheats. He files for a restraining order in Marin County, California, 200 miles away, although wife has not lived there since summer 1995 nor does she visit there due to her disabilities restricting her ability to travel. Husband has wife served with Marin County California court papers in Reno on a Thursday evening while she is teaching an evening credit class at Truckee Meadows Community College. According to those court papers, a court hearing was scheduled by husband in Marin County California for first thing that Monday morning for a temporary restraining order against wife. Therefore, wife thinks she had only 8 business hours that Friday to find and hire a California attorney. Didn’t happen. So wife mails pro per response to Marin Court and husband’s attorney. Illegally, husband gets a 3-year default restraining order against wife and wife is threatened with prison if she has a gun for protection although recent evidence proved she desperately now needs a gun.

Problems, here is an illegally obtained restraining order, and the gun restriction is illegal. For several reasons. First, it is illegal for service to be 36 hours before a court hearing. Therefore, husband, his attorney and/or the Marin County courts falsified the date of service. Second, a gun prohibition is unconstitutionally illegal. As the US Supreme Court just recently again affirmed. Third, a blanket restriction of a gun prohibition in every restraining order is unconstitutionally illegal. As the US Supreme Court just recently again affirmed. Fourth, wife had mailed her pro per response to the Marin County court, so that court issuing a default order is illegal. Fifth, a California court issued a default order against a Nevada citizen that they have no legal jurisdiction over. Sixth, Novato, California police have threatened to jail the wife based on this illegally obtained order.

“You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.”- Mark Twain. Marin County California is the most liberal county in America. They have repeatedly evidenced that they are willing to break several laws, repeatedly thumbed their nose at the US Constitution, imposed their illegal actions on a Nevada citizen, threatened a Nevada citizen, and terrorized a Nevada citizen. Who and what’s next?

Inspired by BrooWaha writer D.E. Carson’s Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Second Amendment.

Sources and further readings: Washoe District Court, Marin County (California) Superior Court, Reno Police Department reports, Twin Cities (California) Police reports, Sausalito (California) Police reports, Marin (County California) General Hospital medical reports, Now You Call It Madness (But I Call It Love ), A List of Questions I Promise Not To Pose , Cheaters Among Us, Olson , California’s Legal Secret Marriage Racket , Get All Those Instructors You Can – Or Maybe No t, Bigamists Among Us, Olson, Flip Flop RERs Among Us, James K. Olson.

Copyright © 2008 Craig B

No comments:

Post a Comment

Consumers are Less Likely to Keep Their Opinions to Themselves

Everyday consumers of goods and services now have the Internet to describe their experiences with businesses and those businesses’ employees.

Government executives, administrators and all government employees, businesses, both non-profit and profit, legal and not legal, and every single one of their owners and employees, and all religious participants are ever increasingly more vulnerable to exposure, and accountability.

Consumers have become bolder that their payment means total accountability for what consumers paid for. Consumers are less likely to keep to their place, do as they’re told and keep their opinions to themselves.

Today’s governments, businesses or religions that dismiss or ignore consumers do so at their own risk. The Internet is free at public libraries, free at many businesses and free to anyone that wants to crawl on to it from a nearby wireless connection. Consumers of these goods and services more often than not relate bad experiences over good experiences. Exercising their freedom of speech rights where legal and illegal in other countries, they not only spell out and link the offending business’ name and location, but also the offending employees and/or owner’s names and locations. They spell out in great detail, and link with supporting documentation, their complaints.

I am glad to see “Gone are the days where settings from Auschwitz to Abu Ghraib contaminated in isolation both superiors and subordinates.” I am glad “the Internet is real-time exposure forcing attention, and repercussions.” I am glad “The result has been an increase in holding others accountable, just saying no and exposes.”Governments, schools, teachers, businesses, attorneys, judges, Realtors, home loan lenders, doctors, mechanics, hospitals, religions, etc. should be “relentlessly interviewed, closely monitored, increasingly resisted, and constantly scrutinized.”

“Online exposes and nastiness” happen for a reason.

Reasons like bad customer service or injustice. “As the realization sinks in that the Internet is also a real time conduit of ones’ reputation,” customer service will be deliberately forced to get only better.I have come to the recent conclusion that the Internet has made the Better Business Bureau a dinosaur. The BBB does not publish what the complaint is, and without that, the complaint is useless. Complaints made to the BBB about businesses not providing goods and services as advertised or legally required, bar associations about lawyers lying and taking client’s money but not doing what they were paid to do, Realtor associations about Realtors clearly violating written ethics rules, ethics committees, commissions, etc. should not be private. Instead, all should be public.

That’s another reason why there is an increase on the Internet of complaints and exposes. Too often, ranks have closed in around an offending member and protected them rather than hold them accountable. Or worse, the accused makes threats against the complaintant and witnesses, or bribes are offered by the accused and accepted by the investigator(s), prosecutors and/or judges.

The Internet is the medium to not only expose the offending member, but also these cover ups by those paid to investigate, judge and punish offenders.Public records are public to protect the public. That’s why our publicly elected officials voting records are public. That’s why publicly elected officials can only have public meetings “putting their opinions and conclusions easily available to everyone.” That’s why all complaints, investigations and outcomes should be public.

As MadMax wrote, “Remember, we have a legal system, not a justice system.”

HOWEVER, "Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it."

John Adams, (2nd President of the United States of America), 1776 (Thoughts on Government)

Groovy Stuff

Monday, March 2, 2009

Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts

No comments:

Post a Comment

Stop Googling Yourself or You'll Go Blind

Don't Let It End With A Whimper

You Decide

Stop the Californication of Nevada

Don't Shut Up & Just Do As You're Told

Consumers are Less Likely to Keep Their Opinions to Themselves

Blog Archive

About Me

My Blog List