In my story about Flipper James K. Olson @ http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3630, I discovered a preponderance of clear and convincing evidence that Marin County; California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover had lied and created false documents -- seemingly for the benefit of his client James K. Olson. One of Schoonover’s lies and false documents is a “letter” Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover had purported in Reno, Nevada and Marin County, California court papers to “write.” There Schoonover claims he wrote and mailed this letter years ago to the Mrs. Reno Olson. Presumably Marin County; California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover charged James K. Olson for the writing of this “letter” and insists that this letter was returned to Schoonover unopened. Marin County; California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover’s then alleged letter was a written demand for the Reno Mrs. Olson “to only contact him (Jim) at home, not work, you have the number.”
1. Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover cannot produce the original letter and envelope although he claims “it was returned unopened” to him. Whoever heard of any lawyer not keeping paperwork?
2. Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover cannot produce any invoice that he billed James K. Olson for writing this alleged “letter.” Whoever heard of any lawyer working for free?
3. Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover cannot produce any receipt or entry in his books or bank accounts that he received payment from James K. Olson for writing this alleged “letter.” Whoever heard of any lawyer working for free or not keeping paperwork?
4. James K. Olson cannot produce any receipt or credit card bill or cancelled check that he paid Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover for writing this alleged “letter” on James K. Olson’s behalf.
Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover instead after the fact invented a “letter”, and provided it unsigned by Schoonover and not on letterhead as known false evidence to the Reno, Nevada and Marin County, California courts.
That letter is the first written evidence that James K. Olson was engaged in deliberately hiding his Reno, Nevada life as early as Fall 1995 from his Marin County, California life. A successful 11-year double life until James K. Olson was caught in his double life in September 2006.
If that’s not bad, startling, immoral, illegal and unethical enough in and of itself, what was written in this after the fact letter is even worse. Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover puts into the Reno, Nevada and Marin County, California courts’ records that he then wrote James K. Olson about Olson’s Reno wife and what Schoonover strongly recommended since Schoonover’s letter had been returned unopened by Olson’s Reno wife.
Here’s what Schoonover strongly recommended according to the court records of Reno, Nevada and Marin County, California. Schoonover writes his alleged then client James K. Olson that Schoonover’s letter had been returned unopened and that Jim, James K. Olson, should try to trick her, the Reno Mrs. Olson, since she trusted him. That James K. Olson should himself write his Reno wife as she, since she loves him, would unsuspectingly open his letter (bomb).
Again, Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover inconceivably has no record of billing James K. Olson or of being paid by James K. Olson for that “work.” Nor does James. K. Olson have any record of paying Schoonover for that “work.”
Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover told James K. Olson to use Olson’s wife’s love for Jim Olson and trust in Jim Olson, to again and further deliberately hurt her.
That’s low.
There is no evidence offered, claimed nor provided in the Reno, Nevada and Marin County, California courts’ records that James. K. Olson took his attorney’s advice and wrote Schoonover’s recommended letter bomb to his Reno wife. Instead, there is a preponderance of clear and convincing evidence that James K. Olson continued to hide his life with the Reno Mrs. Olson from his Marin County, California life until caught in September 2006.
James K. Olson did this same behavior during each of his four divorce filings from his wife. Each divorce filing that according to the Marin County, California court records James K. Olson reconciled with her and then dismissed. He continued to regularly see her, regularly spent nights with her, all the while concealing all that from his Marin County, California attorneys, the judges, the marriage therapists, his work, his friends, and his family. Instead he vilified and demonized her to them. From fall 1995 on, James K. Olson kept her and his Reno life a secret from his California work, his California friends, his family, and the IRS.
Copies of James K. Olson’s court admission and lies, the filings and dismissals by James K. Olson of his four Marin County, California divorces from the same wife, James K. Olson’s Reno, Nevada homeowners and landlord’s Farmers Insurance documents, the notarized Nevada Living Trust James K. Olson was and is a co-Trustee of with the Reno Mrs. Olson, and the Nevada Deeds of Trust for the dozen or so houses that James K. Olson was on title for along with the Reno Mrs. Olson, are all available for viewing at Reno Exposes @ http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/flip-floppers-among-us-marin.
Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover made up the letter years after the claimed “fact.” James K. Olson had been lying to everyone in his Marin County, California life. Either attorney Schoonover didn’t know his client Olson had lied to him also, or didn’t care. Either way, Marin County, California Attorney Stephen T. Schoonover manufactured false evidence that he later knowingly put into the records of the courts in Reno, Nevada and Marin County, California.
Birds of a feather, like Schoonover and Jim Olson, certainly do flock together.
Internet media has the ability to present new, or previously suppressed, news @ http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=4213.
Everyday consumers of goods and services now have the Internet to describe their experiences with businesses and those businesses’ employees. Government executives, administrators and all government employees, businesses, both non-profit and profit, legal and not legal, and every single one of their owners and employees, and all religious participants are ever increasingly more vulnerable to exposure, and accountability.
Consumers have become bolder that their payment means total accountability for what consumers paid for. Consumers are less likely to keep to their place, do as they’re told and keep their opinions to themselves. Today’s governments, businesses or religions that dismiss or ignore consumers do so at their own risk.
The Internet is free at public libraries, free at many businesses and free to anyone that wants to crawl on to it from a nearby wireless connection. Consumers of these goods and services more often than not relate bad experiences over good experiences. Exercising their freedom of speech rights where legal and illegal, they not only spell out and link the offending business’ name and location, but also the offending employees and/or owner’s names and locations. They spell out in great detail, and link with supporting documentation, their complaints.
I am glad to see “Gone are the days where settings from Auschwitz to Abu Ghraib contaminated in isolation both superiors and subordinates.” I am glad “the Internet is real-time exposure forcing attention, and repercussions @ http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=4375.” I am glad “The result has been an increase in holding others accountable, just saying no and exposes.”
Governments, schools, teachers, businesses, attorneys, judges, Realtors, home loan lenders, doctors, mechanics, hospitals, religions, etc. should be “relentlessly interviewed, closely monitored, increasingly resisted, and constantly scrutinized.”
“Online exposes and nastiness” happen for a reason. Reasons like bad customer service or injustice. “As the realization sinks in that the Internet is also a real time conduit of one’s reputation,” customer service will be deliberately forced to get only better.
I have come to the recent conclusion that the Internet has made the Better Business Bureau a dinosaur. The BBB does not publish what the complaint is, and without that, the complaint is useless. Complaints made to the BBB about businesses not providing goods and services as advertised or legally required, bar associations about lawyers lying and taking client’s money but not doing what they were paid to do, Realtor associations about Realtors clearly violating written ethics rules, ethics committees, commissions, etc. should not be private. Instead, all should be public. But they’re not.
That’s another reason why there is an increase on the Internet of complaints and exposes. Too often, ranks have closed in around an offending member and protected them rather than hold them accountable. Or worse, the accused makes threats against the complaintant and witnesses, or bribes are offered by the accused and accepted by the investigator(s), prosecutors and/or judges. The Internet is the medium to not only expose the offending member, but also these cover ups by those paid to investigate, judge and punish offenders.
Public records are public to protect the public. That’s why our publicly elected officials voting records are public. That’s why publicly elected officials can only have public meetings “putting their opinions and conclusions easily available to everyone.” That’s why those with public licenses have their records public. That’s why all complaints, investigations and outcomes should be public.
James “Jim” K. Olson sources are
Gun Controllers Among Us, Marin County California Courts, http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3749
Flip Flop Rers Among Us, James K. Olson, http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3630
Bigamists Among Us, Olson, http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3481
Cheaters Among Us, Olson, http://www.broowaha.com/article.php?id=3334
Cold-Hearted Tricksters Among Us, James K. Olson, http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/coldhearted-tricksters-among
Insurance Fraudsters Among Us, James K. Olson, http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/insurance-fraudsters-among-us
An Open Letter to The IRS About James K. Olson, http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/an-open-letter-to-the-irs
The Dishonorable Lazy, Incompetent, Ignorant or Corrupted Reno Judge Frances Doherty? http://renomortgagefraudexposes.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the-dishonorable-lazy
Photo is of James "Jim" K. Olson with the Reno Mrs. Olson at Reno's Ballantine's Ballroom circa 2006. Note that both of them are wearing their wedding rings.
No comments:
Post a Comment